The WSDOT website travel times
during this past week of closure are a clear indication east side cities have ample reasons to prepare for planning to take legal action to prevent Sound Transit from beginning constructing light rail on the I-90 Bridge center roadway. They show the 4th lanes
added for HOV on the I-90 bridge will not make up for the loss of the two
center roadway lanes. Three
examples comparing current times with previous (i.e. before center roadway
closure) averages are:
6/06/17 7:15 Issaquah to
Seattle travel times increased from 27 to 37 minutes
6/07/17 7:30 Issaquah to
Seattle travel times increased from 31 to 45 minutes
6/08/17 8:10 Issaquah to
Seattle travel times increased from 30 to 46 minutes
The increases are no “surprise”
to those who have “viewed” previous posts on this blog about the likely
result. It’s also a vindication of
the 2004 FHWA ROD stipulating the center roadway lanes were still needed for
vehicles with the added R-8A HOV lanes.
(Earlier posts raised “suspicions” Sound Transit delayed adding the 4th
lanes for years to when they were ready to begin light rail construction in an attempt to avoid any outer roadway capacity demonstration.)
As a result of the center roadway
closure I-90 commuters, who having had to endure years of congestion, frequently
beginning near Issaquah to near I-405, now face congestion across
Mercer Island and I-90 Bridge. And
it’s only going to get worse!
First with increasing numbers of cross-lake commuters based on Sound
Transit's EIS predictions they'll double by 2030.
Second, when East Link does begin operation, it will increase, not decrease the number of vehicles (and congestion) on the 1-90 GP
lanes. East Link’s share of the
Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel will be limited to one 4-car train every 8
minutes. The PSRC concluded that
the 74-seat cars can reasonably average up to 148 riders. East Link won't have the capacity to accommodate current transit traffic let alone future growth. Yet Sound Transit intends to use this
limited East Link to replace cross-lake buses, routing them to South Bellevue
and Mercer Island light rail stations. Presumably their attempt to claim East Link will reduce I-90 Bridge congestion.
The reality is, at least during the peak commute, East
Link can only replace about 50 buses per hour on the HOV lanes; and it's never going to increase! Even worse, it’s not the HOV lanes that have
the most severe problem, it’s the GP lanes. The 50-bus HOV reduction will do nothing to
reduce their congestion.
Instead GP congestion will likely increase because many of those forced
to transfer to and from light rail trains will decide its not worth the hassle
and choose to “drive” rather than "ride".
The increased number of vehicles with future growth and former transit
riders will surely further increase the above cross-lake travel times.
It’s not clear who will make the
final decision regarding whether the I-90 Bridge outer roadways provide
sufficient capacity. One of the problems with the
WSDOT making that assessment is they’ve already told a federal judge in the
Freeman litigation the modified outer roadways would have adequate capacity. (It
was that decision that allowed Sound Transit to proceed with East Link.) They may
be “reluctant” to reverse their position.
They would also loose potential revenue since stopping I-90 light rail construction would end any need for the outer roadway HOT lanes they included in their 2007 commitments to Mercer Island. It would also minimize any increased 520 toll revenue from those avoiding I-90 congestion. Even the FHWA has been reluctant to enforce their 2004 ROD requirement to maintain center roadways for vehicles.
They would also loose potential revenue since stopping I-90 light rail construction would end any need for the outer roadway HOT lanes they included in their 2007 commitments to Mercer Island. It would also minimize any increased 520 toll revenue from those avoiding I-90 congestion. Even the FHWA has been reluctant to enforce their 2004 ROD requirement to maintain center roadways for vehicles.
What’s clear is Sound Transit should not
be allowed to begin construction on I-90 bridge until some independent
assessment confirms outer roadway capacity. They surely can't complain about any delays since they could have done the demonstration years ago if they hadn't delayed adding the 4th lanes. The most likely way of doing so is for Mercer Island
and/or other east side cities to take legal action to prevent Sound Transit
from proceeding until the outer roadway capacity is deemed adequate. They surely have an obligation to their commuters to do so.
It obviously has to be done very quickly. The entire area will suffer for a very long time if they don't and Sound Transit is allowed to proceed.
Addendum: The 7:20 June 12th travel times from Bellevue to Seattle increased from 15 to 24 minutes.
It obviously has to be done very quickly. The entire area will suffer for a very long time if they don't and Sound Transit is allowed to proceed.
Addendum: The 7:20 June 12th travel times from Bellevue to Seattle increased from 15 to 24 minutes.
No comments:
Post a Comment