About this blog

My name is Bill Hirt and I'm a candidate to be a Representative from the 48th district in the Washington State legislature. My candidacy stems from concern the legislature is not properly overseeing the WSDOT and Sound Transit East Link light rail program. I believe East Link will be a disaster for the entire eastside. ST will spend 5-6 billion on a transportation project that will increase, not decrease cross-lake congestion, violates federal environmental laws, devastates a beautiful part of residential Bellevue, creates havoc in Bellevue's central business district, and does absolutely nothing to alleviate congestion on 1-90 and 405. The only winners with East Link are the Associated Builders and Contractors of Western Washington and their labor unions.

This blog is an attempt to get more public awareness of these concerns. Many of the articles are from 3 years of failed efforts to persuade the Bellevue City Council, King County Council, east side legislators, media, and other organizations to stop this debacle. I have no illusions about being elected. My hope is voters from throughout the east side will read of my candidacy and visit this Web site. If they don't find them persuasive I know at least I tried.

Friday, November 10, 2023

A Rational Approach to Link Fares

The November 2nd Executive Board meeting included a 30-minute discussion on existing fare structure and rate and the rationale for a fare change now as the last Link fare change occurred in 2015.  That current fares are based on the distance from where you tap your ORCA card to get on and tap again to get off.  If you don’t tap when you get off, you are charged for the fare to the end of the line.  

 

However, the ST2 system extensions have resulted in large distance-based table and more fare rates that would be even more complicated with future extensions.  The result was to consider a single ”flat” fare for all trips as shown on a chart comparing fares used by “peer transit” agencies,  with some having a peak hour or airport surcharge.  

 

The presentation concluded flat fares benefited from being “simpler to understand and budget for” and required passengers to only tap on. Sound Transit surveys had shown riders were split with 52% preferring distance-based fare and 48% preferring flat rate.  The rider preference presumably reflected the distance of their commute. 


The subsequent discussion about “Next steps” resulted in a "12/15: Board for potential action on Link fare". The board should consider a fairer approach for both commuters would be to set fares based on distance from where riders got on buses or trains to either CID or Westlake stations. 


No fares would be collected at either CID or Westlake. Inbound fares would include the cost of the return commute to deal with the ambiguity to the return destination.  Commuters going beyond CID or Westlake to SeaTac, east side, or UW would pay the fares covering those costs on their return.  


It shouldn't be that difficult.

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment