My Voters’ Pamphlet Statement this
year reflects my attempt as a gubernatorial candidate to tell the widest
possible audience Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth” about CO2 emissions is in fact
a monumental lie. My hope was to use the general election as a platform to debunk Gov Inslee, one of the most prominent advocates for "CO2 emissions are an
existential threat”.
The reality is the
Seattle Times decision to promote “Republican leaders” choice fractures the
anti-Tim Eyman vote and other candidates willingness to spend funds on totally
futile attempts to defeat Inslee make it less likely I’ll be on the ballot
this fall.
It's unfortunate since none of the other campaign ads
I’ve seen have dealt with Sound Transit and WSDOT failure to reduce congestion or Seattle Times abetting that failure.
Also no one has mentioned the futility of Inslee's attempts to reduce the state’s
carbon emissions with windmills, solar panels, or battery powered cars as the way to
reduce global warming.
My global warming denier platform debunking the CO2 emission concerns would rely on two sources. (Replacing earlier analysis in Voters' Pamphlet) The first would be a
National Academy of Science Nov 10th 2015 paper:
Shortwave and Longwave Radiative Contributions
to Global Warming Under Increasing CO2
The paper concluded:
Altogether, these results suggest that,
although greenhouse gas forcing predominantly acts to reduce Outgoing Longwave
Radiation (OLR), the resulting global warming is likely caused by enhanced
Absorbed Solar Radiation (ASR)
The NAS clearly
concluded global warming was the result of increased warming from the Sun not
from increased radiation from the atmosphere due to CO2.
The second was a NASA
Dec 9th 2019 paper “Solar Cycle 25 Prediction 2019 – Bing”. It included charts concluding the
following:
Global Warming Ruse - Temperatures Getting Colder. CO2 is not a player
CO2 warning is a myth. The real threat is cold beginning
of a new little ice age epoch in 2020.
It’s going to the cold for a very long time
CO2 warming effect decreases with concentration. CO2 has
less and less effect with increased concentration. CO2 can go to
1,000 to 2000 or to 5,000 and it won’t warm the earth.
I look forward to the
opportunity of using NAS and NASA to support my "global warming denier" platform this fall.
So, you either didn't actually read the science behind this, or cherry-picked the data to get a confirmation bias on your end, and you are deliberately using a political platform to misinform people looking for actual change in your state, when there is an overwhelming majority of scientific consensus across various fields of scientific study that actually confirms what global climate change is?
ReplyDeleteIt isn't just warming. It is extreme weather shifts, stronger storms, melting polar ice sheets, glacial melts, rising ocean levels, mass extinction, increases in droughts, changes in the jet stream. You're using a political platform in poor faith, to spread bad information, and harming actual science.
Please stop. You're not helping anyone. Please.
No one questions the climate is changing. its been doing so for countless millenniums. Fossil fuel CO2 emissions are not the reason.
ReplyDelete