The May 23rd Bellevue Reporter article concerning Bellevue City Council’s objections to Sound Transit plans
for maintenance yard in Bel Red raises several questions. The most obvious is
why hasn’t the council made relocating the maintenance yard outside the Bel Red
area a pre-condition for approval of the 10 permits ST needs for East
Link.
The council apparently
has never recognized they could use the permitting process to “influence” Sound
Transit East Link decisions. Five years ago they could have required Sound Transit consider
two-way bus rapid transit (BRT) on the center roadway as the “no build”
solution. Any competent analysis would conclude BRT had far greater capacity
and access than light rail ending East Link and the resultant disruption to the lives of
those along the route into Bellevue.
Instead they have
“worked hard with Sound Transit to allow light rail into Bellevue”. Their “hard work” allowed ST to never consider a tunnel for the route into Bellevue, instead agreeing to pay an
extra ~$200 million for a tunnel under the city center. (ST made no demands
for additional funding when they recently decided to extend the Central Link
tunnel all the way to Northgate.) The council also “accepted” the ST preferred route into
the city rather than a BNST route that would have minimized the impact on
Bellevue residents.
The other obvious
question is how is it possible the preferred ST maintenance yard location
“violates all the planning that has been done”. The 2008 Draft Environmental Impact Statement” (DEIS)
included the current location as one of the options more than 5 years ago. One would have thought those doing the
“planning” would have “discovered” this issue a long time ago. Particularly since Mayor Balducci
has been a Sound Transit Board member during that period.
ST has three
alternatives for dealing with the maintenance yard location. The first is they can expand the
current facility along Airport Way to accommodate more cars. Second, they can choose the Lynnwood
location. It’s hard to claim doing so would increase costs since all the trains that go to East Link will also be routed
to Lynnwood. The third option
(this blog’s preference) is they eliminate the need for additional equipment by
replacing cross-lake light rail with BRT and eliminating Lynnwood and Federal Way extensions. Unfortunately if “past is prolog” the council will
again capitulate to ST demands for the maintenance yard.
Even if they succeed in moving the yard, of all the possible disagreements the council could have had with ST
concerning East Link, the adverse affects of the maintenance yard in Bel Red
pale in comparison to the impact of the inevitable frequent I-90 gridlock from ST decisions to confiscate the center
roadway for light rail to replace cross-lake buses. Also those living along the route into Bellevue and
eventually even those in the Bel Red area will suffer far more from light rail construction
and operation than they would ever be affected by the maintenance yard
location. The council’s failure to
recognize these realities is another reason they deserve to be on the “Light
Rail Hall of Shame”.
No comments:
Post a Comment