The
previous post detailed how Sound Transit CEO Rogoff’s 2020 “budget” for public transit
operation was limited to one page with how much each of the transit modes will
receive but nothing as to how they will spend it. This post details why the real 2020 budget debacle is that the more than $2 billion spent on system expansion is just the latest installment of Rogoff’s plan to spend $96 billion on his 2019 budget for light rail extensions that do nothing to increase their capacity into Seattle. That he compounds that problem by choosing to use light rail to replace bus routes reducing total transit capacity into the city.
The 2020
budget adds another year to Sound Transit’s decade of failure to
recognize Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel (DSTT) limitation on light rail
capacity into Seattle. The
billions spent on Prop 1 extensions beyond UW, across I-90 Bridge to Bellevue,
or beyond SeaTac to Federal Way will do nothing to increase that capacity.
Sound
Transit compounds that problem by continuing its decade-long refusal to fund
added parking or local bus routes needed for access to the light rail
extensions. (Their disdain for
added bus routes is exemplified by annual bus revenue vehicle miles
increasing from 11,627,380 in 2011 to 11,884,230 in 2018.)
The lack
of added access to even light rail’s limited capacity has forced Sound
Transit to use it to replace existing bus routes into Seattle. The result being Sound Transit is
spending billions on Prop 1 extensions whose operation will reduce total transit
capacity into the city, do little to reduce HOV lane congestion, and inevitably increase GP lane congestion.
For example
the budget includes $126 million funding for the Northgate extension. When completed in 2021, operation of the $2.1 billion extension will result in Northgate bus riders forced to use light rail routed through the UW and Capital Hill into Seattle. They’ll be joined by bus riders from
beyond Northgate, forced to endure the hassle of transferring to the light rail route rather than commute directly into Seattle. Worse, any light
rail riders added by the extension will reduce access for current UW Link
riders.
Their exit at one of the two DSTT stations will “likely” be further from their desired destination than the stops along the bus routes they previously used. Their return commute will require they endure the inevitable chaos resulting from thousands of riders attempting to find access at one of the two DSTT stations and the hassle of those transferring back to buses at Northgate. Clearly Northgate operation would seem to be a disincentive to use public transit.
Their exit at one of the two DSTT stations will “likely” be further from their desired destination than the stops along the bus routes they previously used. Their return commute will require they endure the inevitable chaos resulting from thousands of riders attempting to find access at one of the two DSTT stations and the hassle of those transferring back to buses at Northgate. Clearly Northgate operation would seem to be a disincentive to use public transit.
The 2020
budget also includes $505 million for the $3.2-billion Lynnwood extension whose
operation adds to that disincentive.
When completed in 2024, operation will simply move where many commuters transfer to and from light
rail the 8.5 miles north to Lynnwood. The only
difference being the longer route will require more light rail cars and will double its
operating cost.
The $756
million spent on the East Link extension to Overlake and beyond to Redmond is
even less “productive” congestion wise.
The reason being Sound Transit again insists on using the $3.6 billion
project to replace I-90 buses.
However Mercer Island objections to using the island station as the
terminus have resulted in Sound Transit and King County Metro halving their
current I-90 corridor bus routes. East
Link operation will still result in Mercer Island being inundated with hundreds
of transferees every morning and afternoon and thousands of I-90 corridor
commuters will loose access to public transit.
The bottom
line is the 2020 “budget” continues a decade of failure to recognize the
benefits of increased bus service.
A 70-ft
articulated bus can accommodate 119 sitting and standing riders. Adding 100 such buses an hour could
accommodate more than 10,000 riders, the equivalent of 5 lanes of freeway, without spending a dime on light rail extensions. Yet Rogoff's 2019 long term budget continues Sound Transit's refusal to increase bus transit capacity until 2041.
The added bus capacity is also more than the 8880 riders per hour a 2004 PSRC study, funded by Sound
Transit, concluded for light rail routed through the DSTT. The billions spent on East Link and Central Link south will
share that limited capacity. While
additional bus routes can be added to increase transit capacity, light rail capacity on the Prop 1 extensions
will always be limited. The 2020
budget is only the next installment of Rogoff’s 2019 budget plan to spend most of $96
billion on this debacle.
This year's Sound Transit Board "likely" budget approval exemplifies their continued failure to understand the basics of effective public transit. It's way past time for the Seattle Times to end its decade of abetting Sound Transit's incompetence and urge the board to reject the 2020 budget. That at least could be the "beginning of the end" for this debacle.
This year's Sound Transit Board "likely" budget approval exemplifies their continued failure to understand the basics of effective public transit. It's way past time for the Seattle Times to end its decade of abetting Sound Transit's incompetence and urge the board to reject the 2020 budget. That at least could be the "beginning of the end" for this debacle.
No comments:
Post a Comment