About this blog

My name is Bill Hirt and I'm a candidate to be a Representative from the 48th district in the Washington State legislature. My candidacy stems from concern the legislature is not properly overseeing the WSDOT and Sound Transit East Link light rail program. I believe East Link will be a disaster for the entire eastside. ST will spend 5-6 billion on a transportation project that will increase, not decrease cross-lake congestion, violates federal environmental laws, devastates a beautiful part of residential Bellevue, creates havoc in Bellevue's central business district, and does absolutely nothing to alleviate congestion on 1-90 and 405. The only winners with East Link are the Associated Builders and Contractors of Western Washington and their labor unions.

This blog is an attempt to get more public awareness of these concerns. Many of the articles are from 3 years of failed efforts to persuade the Bellevue City Council, King County Council, east side legislators, media, and other organizations to stop this debacle. I have no illusions about being elected. My hope is voters from throughout the east side will read of my candidacy and visit this Web site. If they don't find them persuasive I know at least I tried.

Thursday, December 5, 2019

ST CEO Rogoff’s “No-Budget” 2020 Budget


It’s been over a year since Sound Transit CEO Rogoff presented his 2019 budget to the Sound Transit Board.  The initial 23 pages of the 232-page document provided an overview of Sound Transit’s plans for 2017-2041.  The Long Range Financial Plan included projections of sources of revenue, how the funds will be spent, and ridership for the various transit modes.

Previous posts have detailed how the 2019 budget’s long-range claims for light rail ridership ignored the limitations of light rail routed through the Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel (DSTT). That Rogoff’s budget continued Sound Transit’s decade-long refusal to increase bus service for the next 22 years.   That anyone on the Sound Transit Board with a modicum of public transit competence would have recognized Rogoff’s incompetence. They clearly didn’t since they unanimously approved renewing his contract for another three years and giving him a hefty raise.

However the rest of the 247-page budget, in keeping with previous budgets, provided the details about where the money is coming from and how the money was to be spent.  Projected revenue and financial sources for 2019 were provided and compared with 2017 and 2018.  Similar comparisons for 2019 projected expenditures were included for operations and maintenance, salaries and benefits, services, and administration.  

Of particular import were 2019 budget details on how the transit modes would deal with the need to provide public transit.   Projected ridership for five transit modes was compared with previous years.   Detailed comparisons about how the 2019 money was to be spent on Link, Express Bus, Sounder, and Tacoma Link were included.   The budget compared projected service, boardings, and financial performance for the four with previous years.  Operating costs, costs per boarding, and fare box recovery comparisons were also included.


By comparison Rogoff’s 36-page, 2020 Budget doesn’t even include a Table of Contents.  It’s called a “Summary of the 2020 proposed agency budget” claiming “We are here to provide information”.  The budget 2020 “information” included “”Annual revenue and appropriation for all agency expenditures” with charts showing revenue and funding sources, transit operations, debt service, and system and non-system expansion.  

Separate charts showed projected 2020 funding for the transit modes and details of how some of the money will be used for light rail fleet expansion, funding for the different Link extensions, Sounder improvements, and bus system expansion and I-405 BRT.     

The budget concluded with charts showing the timeline for 10/24 overviews of the budget and financial plan with Finance and Audit Committee and Sound Transit Board.  They were followed by a 10/31 budget presentation to the Citizen Oversight Panel and a 11/7 Executive Committee overview of budget. 

The budget timeline concluded with 12/12 final budget recommendations from Executive Committee and System Expansion Committee.  The final budget recommendation from Finance and Audit Committee and board meeting to approve 2020 Budget and Transit Improvement plan are scheduled for 12/19.   

It’s now been nearly 2 months since the 2020 budget was presented to the board.  It’s not clear what was presented to the committees during the October and November reviews.  It’s unlikely those reviews or any December reviews have materially changed the budget or will delay its final approval by the board. 

What’s “remarkable” is Rogoff’s 2020 budget for funding Sound Transit operations during the year is limited to a single chart. Where previous budgets have included 25-30 pages showing how funds will be spent on Link, ST Express, Sounder, and Tacoma Link,  the 2020 budget only details how much money each mode will get. 

Rogoff’s operating budget fails to detail how the funds will be spent during 2020 on Salaries & Benefits, Services, or Materials & Supplies for the four transit modes and how those expenditures compare with previous years.  It also neglects to provide similar comparisons for projected performance data like service provided, operating costs, ridership, and fare box recovery.

The bottom line is Rogoff’s 2020 operating budget fails any rational accounting standard. (It also raises questions as to how one could even audit the budget)  Its emphasis on funding light rail expansion continues his failure to recognize the DSTT capacity limitations.  It’s way past time for the Sound Transit Board and the Seattle Times Traffic Lab to acknowledge that reality  

No comments:

Post a Comment