This year, I again “unexpectedly”
find myself as a “possible” candidate on the ballot for this fall's general
election. Last year I was on the
general election ballot because the two other candidates to replace Dow Constantine as King County Executive were even less viable. The Seattle
Times didn’t bother to interview me, yet, without spending a dime
campaigning, my candidacy as a Republican attracted over 110,000 votes last
fall.
This year, as with my previous 6
candidacies for public office, I intended to use the primary election Voters’
Pamphlet” to attract attention to this blog. Its 450 posts detail the failure of those responsible to
effectively deal with the area’s transportation problem. I filed as an Independent to avoid
taking votes from my preferred choice, Rodney Tom, whom I assumed would be the
Republican candidate on the general election ballot.
Thus I was surprised when Tom
filed as a Democrat. I was even
more surprised when the two Republicans, who had initially filed for the
office withdrew, leaving me as the only non-Democrat on the ballot. Apparently Tom’s position on social issues
made him more comfortable filing as a Democrat. I have no idea what prompted the two Republicans to
withdraw.
Once again the Times neglected to
interview me. However, even
they agreed Tom was the better choice this fall. Patty Kruderer’s support for a state bank apparently
dissuaded them. As a conservative
I disagreed with several of her positions, but especially objected to her rationale
for a capital gains tax. Claiming,
at a recent forum, that income from the sale of stocks should be taxable while the income a lawyer gets by selling (not giving) advice, or anyone who sells his labor to his employer shouldn’t.
I assumed Tom thought his support
from Democrats and Republicans would enable him to win this fall. However, a recent Kruderer campaign
flier showed a large number of organizations in the Democratic establishment supported
her. Meanwhile, Tom’s fiscal
conservatism may not be sufficient to persuade Republicans to vote for a Democrat during the primary.
Thus, while I had no expectation
of being a candidate this fall and have no expectation of winning, I thought
I’d detail how I intend to use my general election candidacy if on the ballot. First I would try to convince 48th District residents
to demand the Redmond city council demand Microsoft severely restrict the size
of underground parking for their recently announced campus expansion.
All the north/south roads in the area
are currently clogged for much of the day from the 48,000 who currently work
there. Microsoft’s plans for an
additional 8000 will certainly exacerbate the problem. They should be required to greatly
expand the Connector program, initially with large numbers of vans, Connector
bus routes to existing P&R’s and eventually to Microsoft P&Rs, which
likely will cost less than planned underground campus parking.
Second, I would try to persuade 48th District voters and the entire east side urge the
legislature use its DOT oversight to require they limit HOT on the entire I-405
corridor to a single lane. Their plans
for two HOT lanes are apparently based on the absurd claim, “HOT lanes can accommodate 35% more
vehicles than GP lanes because tolls can be raised to prevent clogging.”
The reality is restricting GP to
three lanes between Bothell and Bellevue has increased congestion to where more
commuters are willing to pay the tolls than the HOT lanes can accommodate and
still achieve the promised 45 mph.
The DOT is considering raising the $10 current maximum to further limit
HOT use. While raising rates will
limit HOT use, the DOT should be limited to doing so on a single lane, raising them to whatever
is required to maintain the 45 mph and use the additional lane to reduce GP
congestion.
The DOT plan to limit GP use to
two lanes on the rest of the route will surely increase GP congestion there even more. Even higher tolls won’t
achieve the 45 mph on HOT lanes during much of the commute. Again, tolls could be set on a single
lane to assure 45 mph and the additional lane would reduce GP congestion. The assured 45 mph on HOT lanes would
also provide reliable bus transit routes, increasing public transit if Sound
Transit could ever be persuaded to add parking and bus service.
Third, it’s too late
to stop Sound Transit from devastating the route into the into Bellevue for an East Link extension that will increase I-90 Bridge congestion. However, 48th District
residents and the entire east side should not be required to have the vast
majority of their ST3 taxes spent on light rail extensions they’ll rarely
use. I would use my candidacy to urge
voters demand Attorney General Ferguson require Sound Transit comply with the Revised
Code of Washington (RCW).
RCW
81.104.100 requires high capacity transportation system planning consider “A
do-nothing option and a low capital option that maximizes the current
system”. Yet, Sound Transit
made no attempt to consider two-way bus only lanes on I-90 Bridge center
roadway, or limiting an HOV lane along I-5 to buses during peak commute. Both would have had 10 times light rail
capacity at a fraction of the cost, 10 years sooner. Thus it’s highly unlikely Sound Transit planning for extensions
beyond UW or SeaTac would comply.
While nothing can be
done about the Northgate or Angle Lake extensions, Sound Transit’s should be
required to comply with RCW before proceeding with ST3 extensions to Lynnwood
and Federal Way. As the "presumptive candidate" for governor Ferguson would likely feel compelled to respond. Sound Transit’s “likely” failure to
comply with the order would keep billions of ST3 funds from being
wasted on light rail extensions that will do nothing to reduce congestion and also eliminate the huge operating cost deficits with the longer routes.
Funds that would have
been wasted extending light rail could be used to add the tens of thousands of
parking stalls and bus routes needed to provide the increased public transit
capacity. The only way to reduce congestion on all the major roadways; something Sound
Transit has refused to do for years.
As with my previous 6
candidacies, my candidacy is my way to make a difference. Being on the ballot this fall enhances
my ability to do so.