The Jan 3rd
Seattle Times Traffic Lab article concerning Tim Eyman’s I-976 Initiative to
cut car-tab taxes to a $30 flat-fee continues its failure to effectively “dig
into the regions thorniest transportations issues”. While it’s unfortunate more than 60 cities and towns
would lose revenue with the flat fee, the article fails to “dig into the
issues” concerning the car-tab taxes.
The article attempts
to justify the car-tab taxes claiming
”Sound Transit 3, which more than tripled car-tab
taxes in the Puget Sound region, passed with about 54 percent of the vote in
2016, as voters chose to fund a massive expansion of public transit.
It
neglects to mention that, prior to the vote, a Sound Transit 7/08/2016 post
entitled: “ST3
plan would cost typical adult $169 annually or $14 per month,” included the
following:
Here’s how much a typical adult would pay if ST3 is
approved:
MVET
An adult owning the median value motor vehicle would pay
an additional $43 per year in MVET if ST3 were passed. The updated calculation
reflects an annual median value $5,333 of vehicles in the Sound Transit
District. MVET taxes are determined by a state of Washington depreciation
schedule for a specific vehicle’s model and production year. The previous
calculation relied on a less representative average vehicle value of $10,135
for the more expansive tri-county area, for a significantly higher annual cost
of $78 per adult.
Like many who took
umbrage, I recently paid $424 in Regulator Transit Authority taxes for car-tabs
on a 2-year old car; nearly 10 times predicted increase. Yet, Sound Transit, rather than
conceding they'd misled voters, responded to voter complaints in an April 20, 2017 post
headlined “Sound Transit 3 car tab rollback threatens light rail to Everett”
During the campaign, Sound Transit was completely
transparent about the taxes. We all knew that our car tabs would increase a lot
in 2017 to help fund Sound Transit. So when the first invoices arrived, the
vast majority of people just paid their tabs. But a vocal minority, with big
tabs from expensive cars, took their displeasure to Olympia, hoping that the
Legislature would listen to their stories and disregard the will of the people.
Yet the Traffic Lab
article justifying the car-tab taxes neglects to mention not only was it a
Sound Transit post that had lied about what car tabs would cost before the
vote, they neglected to mention that after the vote Sound Transit claimed,
“complete transparency about the taxes”.
Joel Connelly June 8th 2017
Seattle PI article concluded, “ST3 would get only 37% support were voters given
a do-over,” a clear indication Sound Transit car-tab mendacity played a major
role in its passage. It’s also
“unlikely” the 70% of Seattle voters, who enabled ST3 approval, would have done
so if the Traffic Lab had informed them any riders added by the extensions
would end access to current riders during peak commute.
Instead the recent Traffic
Lab article continues abiding Sound Transit mendacity and CEO Rugoff’s 2019 absurd budget plans for 2017 to 2041. The entire area will pay a very heavy
price if they continue to do so.
No comments:
Post a Comment