The previous post detailed the
Seattle Times Traffic Lab failure to recognize Sound Transit’s decision to use
Prop 1 funds to extend Central Link routed through the Downtown Seattle Transit
Tunnel (DSTT) prevented it from ever having the capacity needed to reduce
congestion on I-5 and I-90 corridors into the city. That even Central Link’s limited capacity was of “dubious
value” since the two DSTT stations can’t provide the platform space riders need to access Central Link trains during peak return commute. That the fare box revenue from Central Link's limited capacity will require a huge subsidy to cover the longer route operating costs.
It’s unlikely any tunnel under
Seattle could provide the transit capacity into the city to reduce congestion on
I-5 and I-90, or stations with sufficient platform space needed to access light
rail trains for their return commute. However, a single freeway lane can achieve 45 mph if traffic
is limited to 2000 vehicles per hour.
A 70-ft articulated bus can accommodate up to 119 sitting and
standing riders so a bus-only lane or an HOT lane with fees set to limit
vehicles to what’s required to achieve a target speed could easily provide fast, reliable transit capacity into and out of Seattle.
Egress from and access to the bus
routes in Seattle could be expedited with an elongated T/C along 4th
Ave. Each bus route could
have one or two designated drop off locations on one side for egress in Seattle
and one or two designated pick up locations on the other side for the return
commute. The designated drop off and pick up locations rather than "on demand" would expedite both egress and access. They would still likely be more convenient for most commuters than the DSTT stations and would avoid
the huge “hassle” of trying to get access to trains at the stations.
While increasing transit capacity
into Seattle and expediting egress and access there is relatively easy,
providing access to the increased capacity into Seattle is more
problematic. The DC Metro
Orange line referred to in an earlier post had more than 3500 parking stalls at
the New Carrollton P&R.
Presumably parking at the other four stations along that line and along
the other five lines into DC were similar.
Contrast that with Sound Transit,
who despite the fact all the P&R’s with access to I-5 and I-90 have been
full for years, has refused to significantly increase parking since Prop 1 was
passed ten year ago. Instead they
recently began implementing “a new parking management strategy” where 50% of
parking in existing P&Rs is reserved for “late arrivals,” eliminating parking
for half the current early riders.
Their only plan for improving bus service, spending $300 million on an
I-405 T/C, doesn’t include any parking for access.
Again,
while additional bus service can be added relatively quickly, Sound Transit’s
decade long failure to add parking has dramatically increased cost to where it
now costs more than $50,000 to provide a commuter with parking for transit access. Clearly reducing
congestion on the area’s roadways requires better ways to increase access to
transit into Seattle.
One
option would be for Sound Transit to turn all the existing P&R's into T/Cs, each able to accommodate waiting buses and stalls for cars to drop off and pick up commuters. Each T/C would serve as the interface between local buses collecting commuters from near where they live with express bus routes into Seattle. The cost of providing a commuter with access via a local bus route to the P&R T/C
would be a tiny fraction of what would be required to implement and maintain a parking
stall for their car at an existing or new P&R. The
local routes and the P&R T/Cs could also begin adding transit access far sooner than
any added parking.
Sound
Transit could survey all those who commute into Seattle to determine how to
schedule local routes to and from each P&R T/C.
Routes into Seattle could
include stops at one or more suburban T/Cs. In some cases the local buses would
be routed directly into Seattle. As
stated earlier each bus would have one or two dedicated drop off and pick up
locations to facilitate egress from and access to transit there.
The
bottom line is Sound Transit is spending billions on Prop 1 light rail
extensions that don’t increase transit capacity into Seattle. They fail to add the parking
needed to access even this limited light rail into the city or the platform space at stations in Seattle needed to access light
rail out of the city.
Sound Transit has already been allowed to spend nearly ten years and billions on a fatally flawed transportation system. They need to be "persuaded" to begin implementing a transit system
that works and that could begin doing so in 2-3 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment