The end of the 2018 legislative session
marks another year of the House and Senate Transportation Committee’s feckless
response to the area’s roadway gridlock. Clearly neither Rep. Judy Clibborn, the chair of the
House Transportation Committee, nor Sen. Steve Hobbs, the head of the Senate
Transportation Committee, had any interest in legislation requiring Sound
Transit be audited. Any competent audit would surely have exposed the total
failure of Sound Transit policies to reduce area’s congestion. (They even managed to avoid passing the
well-deserved car tab reduction despite having control of both house and
senate.)
For example, the Sound Transit
Staff recently responded to a 2012 Board request “to
update the agency’s parking policy” to “better manage demand at the
regions park-and-rides”. It consisted
of proposing a “parking-permit program that would allow solo drivers to pay for
a reserved space at selected transit facilities”. Apparently neither the Sound Transit Board in 2012 nor their
Staff by 2018 recognized that the best way to “update the agency’s parking
policy” was to add more parking.
As a result, it’s been five years of public transit failure that’s
likely to continue.
All the P&R lots with access
to transit have been full for years, yet Sound Transit didn’t recognize the need
to add parking in 2012 and still hasn’t done so. During the last five years they’ve budgeted nearly $6
billion on “System Expansions” with ~80 percent of that on light rail
expansions, without including a single major P&R with access to bus routes.
The $6 billion already spent
is but a tiny fraction of the billions Sound Transit has already dedicated to creating
their light rail spine. Yet they
wait unto 2024 to begin adding a measly 8560 stalls by 2041.
Sound Transit’s failure to add
parking goes along with their failure to increase the number of bus trips. Their Quarterly Ridership reports
showed 2012, 4th quarter bus trips, 115,163, had increased to only
120,400 during the 2017 4th quarter. Clearly, Sound Transit has shown little interest in
increasing public transit “supply”.
It’s no wonder comparable total average express-bus-weekday boarding
only increased from 54,345 to 61,526 during the five years.
Sound Transit’s five-year failure
to increase public transit capacity is reflected in Puget Sound Regional
Council’s “Stuck in Traffic: 2015 Report”. It included a chart showing the 32,700 hours of delay in
2014 represented a 52% increase in delays between 2009 and 2014. A more recent Feb 12th, 2018
Seattle Times Traffic Lab article reported 2016 traffic delays were nearly 2.5
times the 2009 levels.
The
article reported between Everett and Seattle, “you had to
budget 94 minutes to drive alone during the morning commute, an increase of nine
minutes over the 2014 commute”. A clear result of Sound Transit failure to increase public
transit supply between the two with 4th Quarter 2012 weekday boarding,
8460, increasing to only 8472 in 2017 4th Quarter.
Sound Transit’s decision in 2012 to “manage demand” rather than
increase supply has resulted in five years of increased not decreased
congestion. Their current plans to
spend $54 billion on a light rail spine routed through the Downtown
Seattle Transit Tunnel will only continue that trend.
The Sound Transit Board needs to be "persuaded" to increase public
transit supply. One way to do
so is with new P&R lots where commuters pay to reserve a stall with assured
access to a free ride on their preferred bus route into Seattle. Those paying the fees needed to cover
Sound Transits normal 35% of operation costs would allow others to ride
free. For example, the 12/03/17 post detailed how parking fees from three
1000-stall Pay-to-Park lots near Lynnwood ($10) and two near Everett ($15) could
provide 20,000 more commuters with daily public transit capacity into and out
of Seattle.
For $350 million
(assuming $50,000 per parking
stall and $100 million for buses) Sound Transit could add the equivalent of 4-5 lanes of capacity during peak commute between Everett and
Seattle. The I-5 corridor South of Seattle and I-90 corridor to Issaquah
could also benefit from Pay-to-Park.
And they could begin doing so in 3 to 4 years for a fraction of the
money they’ll spend on light rail spine.
The PSRC 2015 report showed HOV lane congestion between Everett
and Seattle had increased travel times to 75 minutes in 2014. Those travel times have surely increased
along with the recent drive-alone travel times. The travel times for the increased public transit supply could be minimized by limiting an HOV lane to buses only or +3HOV during peak commute.
If needed, HOT lanes could be
implemented with fees set to limit non-transit traffic to maintain 45 mph. The benefits from potentially 20,000 fewer vehicles
would more than offset the loss of +2HOV lane.
Each Pay-to-Park lot would have a non-stop BRT route into
Seattle. 4th Ave could
be converted into an elongated T/C to facilitate egress and access with designated
drop-off and pick-up locations on opposite sides depending on the route. While there
could be two drop off locations there would be only one pick up location to
assure those paying for parking would have access.
It’s bad enough Sound Transit’s 2012 decision to “manage demand”
rather than increase public transit supply has already resulted in five years
of increased congestion. It’s
insanity to allow them to spend years and billions more on light rail
extensions that do nothing to increase public transit supply into Seattle and only
add to the congestion.
No comments:
Post a Comment