About this blog

My name is Bill Hirt and I'm a candidate to be a Representative from the 48th district in the Washington State legislature. My candidacy stems from concern the legislature is not properly overseeing the WSDOT and Sound Transit East Link light rail program. I believe East Link will be a disaster for the entire eastside. ST will spend 5-6 billion on a transportation project that will increase, not decrease cross-lake congestion, violates federal environmental laws, devastates a beautiful part of residential Bellevue, creates havoc in Bellevue's central business district, and does absolutely nothing to alleviate congestion on 1-90 and 405. The only winners with East Link are the Associated Builders and Contractors of Western Washington and their labor unions.

This blog is an attempt to get more public awareness of these concerns. Many of the articles are from 3 years of failed efforts to persuade the Bellevue City Council, King County Council, east side legislators, media, and other organizations to stop this debacle. I have no illusions about being elected. My hope is voters from throughout the east side will read of my candidacy and visit this Web site. If they don't find them persuasive I know at least I tried.

Sunday, March 29, 2020

My Voters’ Pamphlet Opposition to the Carbon Tax


The previous two posts have detailed my intent to use the candidacy for governor and the Voters’ Pamphlet statement to inform voters about Seattle Times decade of abiding If not abetting Sound Transit and WSDOT failure to address congestion on area’s roadways.  That our area’s congestion, already one of the worst in the country, is only going to increase if  they’re allowed to continue.

This post details how my candidate’s statement will inform voters why there's no need to reduce state’s fossil CO2 emissions.  Washington currently ranks 25th in the country with 79.3 million tons (Mt) making up 1.5% of the country's 5,107 Mt total.  The state’s 10.88 tons per capita is less than 40 other states.  Clearly reducing the state’s CO2 emissions will have little effect on country’s emissions. 

The entire country currently emits only about 13% of global total, the 2017 total, 5,107 Mt is little changed from the 5,085 Mt 1990 level.  By comparison the world’s fossil CO2 emissions have increased from 22,674 Mt in 1990 to 37,077 Mt in 2017.  China emissions have increased from 2,397 million in 1990 to 10,877 in 2017 and 29% of total.  Yet they have no plans to slow current increases until 2030.  Clearly reducing US emissions will have little effect on total.

Even more important, climatologists overstate the impact of fossil CO2 emissions on global temperatures.  Again, the world’s fossil CO2 emissions have increased from 22,674 Mt in 1990 to 37,077 Mt in 2017.  However, a plot of global temperatures shows the temperatures increased from 1920 until 1945, before significant CO2 emissions, at the same rate as from 1970 to 2018.  The temperature increased from1970 to 1990 at the same rate as from 1990 until 2018 despite the 70% increase in fossil CO2 emissions.  Clearly global temperatures were not that sensitive to those emissions.

Also a plot of CO2 in the atmosphere showed CO2 increased from 320 parts per million (ppm) in 1960, to 396 ppm in 2014. Yet the rate of change from 1970 to 1990 was essentially the same as for 1990 to 2014.  Again despite the 70% increase in fossil CO2 emissions.

If increasing fossil CO2 emissions didn’t increase atmospheric CO2 ppm they could not be the reason for increasing global temperatures.  The only rational explanation was global temperatures, driven by the sun were increasing CO2 out gassing from ocean surface.  

It’s “unlikely” a Washington carbon tax will have any impact on the sun.

No comments:

Post a Comment