I presented
the following to the Bellevue City Council at their Sept 12th
meeting. I’m posting it since they may chose to ignore it.
Dear
Bellevue City Council
My name is
Bill Hirt and I live at 2615 170th SE. I’m here tonight to tell the council you’re “amazing”. It’s not a compliment. A Feb 9th 2015 Sound Transit presentation to the council
detailed their plans to close the South Bellevue P&R in March of this year
to construct the new P&R. It
went into considerable detail about the large number of commuters who used it
to access transit. However, they
were, to put it mildly, vague about their plans to accommodate those
commuters.
The council
subsequently signed an MOU with Sound Transit requiring they do the following:
At
least 60 days prior to the closure Sound Transit will identify and implement
alternate parking and transit access for the commuters who utilize the existing
park and ride
Rather than
doing so Sound Transit simply delayed the closure until after the vote this
fall. They knew the closure would
not only limit transit access at South Bellevue, every eastside P&R would
likely be full well before many commuters arrived. They were concerned those who lost transit access would
respond by rejecting ST3
What’s “amazing”
is the council’s response. Instead
of requiring Sound Transit satisfy the MOU the Sept 8 East Link update to the
council was dedicated to making sure none of the affected commuters could park
on the nearby streets. The council’s
concern was how big to make the restricted parking zone or RPZ and how to
enforce it making it impossible for commuters to walk to the station.
You owe it to your constituents to publicize Sound Transit’s failure to meet the MOU. That, as a result, any commuter who uses an eastside P&R to access transit will likely find it full when they arrive. You need to do so before the vote this fall.
You owe it to your constituents to publicize Sound Transit’s failure to meet the MOU. That, as a result, any commuter who uses an eastside P&R to access transit will likely find it full when they arrive. You need to do so before the vote this fall.
In closing I
notice your agenda tonight includes a discussion as to whether the council
should recommend voters approve ST3. What’s “amazing” is you even have to discuss doing so. Of course the council members have an
obligation to publicly recommend voters approve or reject ST3 and why. Refusing to do so would be absurd.
No comments:
Post a Comment