As expected, the
primary election returns ended my candidacy for the Bellevue City Council. It did give me the chance to attract
attention to my concerns about East Link and the other Prop 1 light rail
extensions. My being in a “contested”
primary allowed me to use the Voters Pamphlet to raise concerns before the BCC
approved the final East Link permits Sound Transit needed this fall. The idea of attending “public forums” a
general election candidacy would have required never appealed to me.
My candidacy did
attract more than 3000 page views for a total of nearly 27,000 to this blog. While I’ve gotten several positive
responses its unclear whether getting the viewers attention will make a
difference. As the saying goes, “You
can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink”. Time will tell whether the “viewers” will convince the BCC to
stop East Link by disallowing the permits ST needs.
Failing to do so still
does not make East Link inevitable.
I believe Sound Transit’s rush to ask voters in 2016 for an additional
billion dollars a year beginning in 2017 reflects a real financial
problem. Without it they will need
to borrow $6.6 billion by 2023 to pay for the current version of the Prop 1
extensions. (That’s in addition to
the $1.3B they’ve already borrowed.)
However, lenders may
question ST ability to make the ~$300M annually payments. The billions they lend for the Prop 1
extensions will create a light rail system “very” expensive to operate. East Link is a particularly
egregious example. It will require
an annual subsidy of nearly $300M to cover the shortfall between the operating
costs and fare box revenue. The
other extensions will undoubtedly add substantially to that shortfall. Thus, it’s not “unreasonable” to
question ST’s ability to make the loan payments.
It’s also presumably
this reality that led ST to ask voters to approve an additional $1B in taxes each
year beginning in 2017, well before any “beyond Prop 1” extensions would need
funding. Without that funding ST
may not be able to proceed with the Prop 1 extensions. The most likely one they’d drop would be
East Link, eliminating its huge operating cost subsidy. Thus defeating ST3 could end East
Link.
(Who knows? Maybe even the Times may question the wisdom of giving ST
$1.7B each year to fund light rail construction that will, not only do
absolutely nothing to reduce the area’s congestion, but will require a $300M
subsidy each year for an East Link extension that will increase cross-lake
congestion.)
Assuming my current
efforts don’t succeed I’ll likely file again to use my candidacy to attract
attention to my opposition to ST3.
I would have liked to challenge County Executive Constantine, not only to get wider attention but to point out his appointments to the Sound Transit Board and his head of the board make him the one most responsible for the future light rail debacle. Unfortunately, I will have to wait until 2017 to do so. Next year it will
likely be another go at Hunter. By then ST will have closed South Bellevue P&R giving transit riders the first
indication of the East Link debacle. To quote an old naval commander “Surrender Hell, I’ve Just Begun to Fight”!
No comments:
Post a Comment